wiki:packagesystem
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| wiki:packagesystem [2024/10/25 09:11] – [Package System] student | wiki:packagesystem [2024/10/25 09:44] (current) – [The "Package Pigeon War"] student | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Package System ====== | ====== Package System ====== | ||
| - | The **Estonian Academy of Arts** (commonly abbreviated as [[https:// | + | The **Estonian Academy of Arts** (commonly abbreviated as [[https:// |
| ==== Origins and Historical Development ==== | ==== Origins and Historical Development ==== | ||
| - | The origins of the **EKA Package System** can be traced back to early 2024, when a student from the Graphic Design Department faced a logistical challenge while attempting to communicate with someone standing below the balcony. The issue stemmed from the difficulty of catching the person' | + | [{{: |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| The success of this initial exchange quickly led to the expansion of the system into a two-way communication and transportation method, where both parties worked collaboratively to assist each other. Within a matter of months, the idea gained significant popularity, and a second zipline was introduced, connecting the Graphic Design Department' | The success of this initial exchange quickly led to the expansion of the system into a two-way communication and transportation method, where both parties worked collaboratively to assist each other. Within a matter of months, the idea gained significant popularity, and a second zipline was introduced, connecting the Graphic Design Department' | ||
| - | The initial design of the box was rudimentary—a 7 cm x 5 cm x 3 cm neon-yellow cardboard container fastened to a rope with materials scavenged from the university’s graphic design baccalaureate department. However, the box’s exposure to inclement weather soon led to its destruction. The undeniable practicality of the **Package Pigeon** inspired students to embark on a redesign process, with the primary objective being to create a more durable, weather-resistant container. After numerous trials and extensive testing, the use of recycled plastic food containers emerged as the most suitable option. These containers offered several advantages: they were readily available, highly customizable, | + | {{ : |
| + | |||
| + | The initial design of the box was rudimentary—a 7 cm x 5 cm x 3 cm neon-yellow cardboard container fastened to a rope with materials scavenged from the university’s graphic design baccalaureate department. However, the box’s exposure to inclement weather soon led to its destruction. The undeniable practicality of the **Package Pigeon** inspired students to embark on a redesign process, with the primary objective being to create a more durable, weather-resistant container. After numerous trials and extensive testing, the use of recycled plastic food containers emerged as the most suitable option. These containers offered several advantages: they were readily available, highly customizable, | ||
| ==== Materials and Construction ==== | ==== Materials and Construction ==== | ||
| - | The materials used in the **Package System** were selected with careful consideration of five critical factors: availability, | + | The materials used in the **Package System** were selected with careful consideration of five critical factors: availability, |
| - | Wood and tin were briefly considered as potential materials; however, they were ultimately deemed impractical due to their scarcity and the complexity of working with them in large quantities. Plastic, by contrast, provided a more efficient and cost-effective solution. Its lightweight nature and pre-formed structure minimised the need for extensive preparation, | + | Wood and tin were briefly considered as potential materials; however, they were ultimately deemed impractical due to their scarcity and the complexity of working with them in large quantities. Plastic, by contrast, provided a more efficient and cost-effective solution. Its lightweight nature and pre-formed structure minimised the need for extensive preparation, |
| ==== Modifications and Technological Advancements ==== | ==== Modifications and Technological Advancements ==== | ||
| Over time, the **Package Pigeon** system underwent several enhancements, | Over time, the **Package Pigeon** system underwent several enhancements, | ||
| + | |||
| With the transition to plastic containers, further modifications were implemented. The containers were painted in bright, vibrant colours to enhance visibility, and a lever mechanism was added to improve ease of use. As the system grew more sophisticated, | With the transition to plastic containers, further modifications were implemented. The containers were painted in bright, vibrant colours to enhance visibility, and a lever mechanism was added to improve ease of use. As the system grew more sophisticated, | ||
| + | |||
| In addition to these functional upgrades, the **Package Pigeon** system also became a canvas for personal expression. As different departments began to adopt the system, students started decorating their boxes with distinctive designs and motifs, often as a way of asserting dominance or identity within the university. These personalised boxes became a hallmark of the system, reflecting the diversity and creativity of the **EKA** student body. | In addition to these functional upgrades, the **Package Pigeon** system also became a canvas for personal expression. As different departments began to adopt the system, students started decorating their boxes with distinctive designs and motifs, often as a way of asserting dominance or identity within the university. These personalised boxes became a hallmark of the system, reflecting the diversity and creativity of the **EKA** student body. | ||
| Line 37: | Line 39: | ||
| ==== The " | ==== The " | ||
| - | By the end of 2024, the introduction of **Big Packages** and the expansion of the system to include advanced ziplines and lifts connecting key areas of the academy sparked unrest among certain factions within the student body. A group calling itself **“Birds Are Fake”** formed in opposition to the continued use of the **Package Pigeon** system. This group believed that the increasing reliance on the package system was detrimental to the traditional forms of communication and movement within the academy, leading to growing tensions between departments. | + | By the end of 2024, the introduction of **Big Packages** and the expansion of the system to include advanced ziplines and lifts connecting key areas of the academy sparked unrest among certain factions within the student body. A group calling itself **“Birds Are Fake”** formed in opposition to the continued use of the **Package Pigeon** system. This group believed that the increasing reliance on the package system was detrimental to the traditional forms of communication and movement within the academy, leading to growing tensions between departments.[{{: |
| - | + | ||
| - | [{{: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In response, the Graphic Design Department spearheaded the formation of a rival group known as **“Packed with Love”**, which sought to defend the **Package Pigeon** system from its detractors. Ironically, this group also became responsible for distributing weapons through the system, escalating the conflict between the two factions. Members of **" | + | |
| - | [{{: | + | In response, the Graphic Design Department spearheaded the formation of a rival group known as **“Packed with Love”**, which sought to defend the **Package Pigeon** system from its detractors. Ironically, this group also became responsible for distributing weapons through the system, escalating the conflict between the two factions. Members of **" |
| The conflict, dubbed the **" | The conflict, dubbed the **" | ||
wiki/packagesystem.1729847508.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/10/25 09:11 by student
